The uuagc package [1] works fine with GHC versions 7.4.* and 7.6.1. However,
with GHC 7.6.2 the binary still compiles but runs into an infinite loop at
runtime. To reproduce, do:
cabal install uuagc touch tmp.ag uuagc tmp.ag
With GHC versions 7.6.2 this succeeds and creates a (rather
A new release (v0.5) of hArduno is out, now supporting servo-motors,
shift-registers, seven-segment displays, and distance sensors. Comes with a
bunch of examples to play around with:
http://leventerkok.github.com/hArduino/
On Hackage: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hArduino
-Levent.
Good to see someone working on an arduino api. I'll have to try this out
sometime.
On 7 March 2013 17:38, Levent Erkok erk...@gmail.com wrote:
A new release (v0.5) of hArduno is out, now supporting servo-motors,
shift-registers, seven-segment displays, and distance sensors. Comes with a
Hi,
I have Haskell Platform with GHC[i] 7.4.2 installed on a MacOS system. There's
a problem with the handling of certain Markdown constructs in literate Haskell
(lines starting with '#') that I understand is fixed in 7.6.2.
Therefore, I'd like to be able to update my GHC installation to
Hi all,
I'm turning to the community for some help understanding some benchmark
results[1]. I was curious to see how the new io-streams would work with
conduit, as it looks like a far saner low-level approach than Handles. In
fact, the API is so simple that the entire wrapper is just a few lines
One clarification: it seems that sourceFile and sourceFileNoHandle have
virtually no difference in speed. The gap comes exclusively from sinkFile
vs sinkFileNoHandle. This makes me think that it might be a buffer copy
that's causing the slowdown, in which case the benchmark may in fact be
I would have expected sourceFileNoHandle to make the most difference, since
that's one location (write) where you've obviously removed a copy. Does
sourceFileNoHandle allocate less?
Incidentally, I've recently been making similar changes to IO code
(removing buffer copies) and getting similar
