Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 17:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michal Gajda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Introduction of general hygienic macro's as you propose, forces us to
cope with following problems:
1. Full typechecking of macros(in place of definition) seems to need
second-rank polymorphism.
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 19:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jan-Willem Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan Bawden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A macro facility is like a pair of vise-grips (if you don't know what
those are, see http://www.technogulf.com/ht-vise.htm).
I found myself laughing
Subject: Re: Interesting: Lisp as a competitive advantage
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 10:16:37 -0400
From: Norman Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.paulgraham.com/paulgraham/avg.html
I wonder how Haskell compares in this regard.
I loved Graham's characterization of the
