ing this maiking list, though.
On Dec 1, 2012 9:18 PM, "wren ng thornton" wrote:
>
> On 11/29/12 2:17 PM, Ivan Salazar wrote:
>>
>> The bad side is that direct translation of algorithms are almost always
>> very slow and the work needed to make them perform is
I hear you, my friend.
What I love of Haskell is that a lot of algorithms are very clean to
express and understand compared to, say, Lisp or C. Compared to Lisp,
function manipulation is also very clean (even compared to Racket). A great
plus is also type inference.
The bad side is that direct tr
I thought this matter was on the back burner.
Add me for a No mascot vote.
Have a good one.
2011/11/27 heathmatlock
> Haskellers.com poll:
> Yes 52 votes (50%), 22 verified votes (53%)
> No 51 votes (49%), 19 verified votes (46%)
>
> Email:
> Yes 14 (64%)
> No8 (36%)
>
>
> Seems a bit divid