Am Dienstag, 6. November 2007 schrieb Andrew Coppin:
Somebody correct me here - I was under the impression that you only ever
need forkIO if you're doing something strange with FFI, and usually you
just want fork?
You're probably thinking of forkOS vs. forkIO.
AFAIK there is no fork in
Am Freitag, 13. Juli 2007 15:03 schrieb peterv:
You see, in C++ I can write:
[snip]
So basically a wrapper around a fixed-size array of any length.
Implementations of (+), (-), dot, length, normalize, etc... then work on
vectors of any size, without the overhead of storing the size, and
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2007 20:14 schrieb Andrew Coppin:
The only thing the libraries provide, as far as I can tell, is the fact
that tuples are all Functors. (In other words, you can apply some
function to all the elements to get a new tuple.) I think that's about
it. I doubt you can use
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2007 11:27 schrieb Ketil Malde:
I notice that when I try to execute a non-existing command with
runInteractiveProcess, nasty things happen when I close the input. To
be exact, the whole program terminates. Is this the intended behavior,
and if so, what is the correct way
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2007 01:24 schrieb Lukas Mai:
Hello, cafe!
I have the following code (paraphrased):
...
forkIO spin
...
spin = do
(t, _) - accept s -- (*)
forkIO $ dealWith t -- (**)
spin
My problem is that I want to stop spin from another thread. The obvious
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2007 04:15 schrieb Thomas Conway:
On 7/6/07, Lukas Mai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see how this solves the problem. AFAICS acceptLoop never returns
and sok is never closed. On the other hand, my program doesn't need a
liveOpCount because the subthreads take care
Hello, cafe!
I have the following code (paraphrased):
...
forkIO spin
...
spin = do
(t, _) - accept s -- (*)
forkIO $ dealWith t -- (**)
spin
My problem is that I want to stop spin from another thread. The obvious
solution would be to throw it an exception. However, that leaks a
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2007 02:13 schrieb Thomas Conway:
Here's my solution:
acceptLoop sok reqChan = do
req - Network.Socket.accept sok
atomically (writeTChan reqChan req)
acceptLoop sok reqChan
mainLoop reqChan quitVar liveOpCountVar = do
action - atomically (quitNow
