is the word OOP persuade so strange on you?
No, my brain exploded by the examples and proposed rules made me look so
When it is exploding I often start acting funnily. And I was fortunate
enough not to begin biting the dogs and scratching the cats after an
attempt to predict an order of
On 11/21/05, David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
class Coord a where
get_x :: a - Double
get_y :: a - Double
set_x :: Double - a - a
set_y :: Double - a - a
I'd say this is a typical OO solution to the problem that doesn't exist
Why do you need setters and getters for coordinate
On 11/18/05, Sebastian Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not saying it's impossible to make good use of (.), I'm saying
that it's not crucial enough to warrant giving it the dot, which in my
opinion is one of the best symbols (and I'd hand it over to record
selection any day of the week!).
2) sequential functions application in OOP style:
[1..100] .map (2*) .sum
Great proposal! And the only feature haskell will lack is computable go to!
And if we add both haskell would become the most expressive and
powerful programming language since INTERCAL
--max
