Dear all,
I am happy to announce the release of tf-random 0.1. tf-random is a
high-quality splittable pseudorandom number generator intended to
address the random number quality problems of the standard Haskell
StdGen generator.
tf-random uses a cryptographic hash function under the hood to
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 18:49 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 6:42:34 PM, you wrote:
What library can be used to securely hash passwords? From what I
any secure hash, say SHA512
It's a good idea to salt your passwords before hashing, though. See
Hi Bulat,
(Note, I'm not using Ubuntu) You may use the packaged versions from
Ubuntu. According to http://packages.ubuntu.org/ Hardy (which is the
current version of Ubuntu) has GHC vesion 6.8.2-2ubuntu1 and gtk2hs
version 0.9.12.1-1ubuntu2. Ubuntu package names are ghc6 and
libghc6-gtk-dev
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 12:35 -0700, Anatoly Yakovenko wrote:
If i have functions in the IO monad, is there a way to use quickcheck
to test them? I have a bunch of C bindings that unfortunately are not
safe. But i would like to be able to use QuickCheck to test them.
Hi Anatoly,
If you want
I was going to suggest using the -xc option of the GHC runtime (if you
are using GHC), but it seems that it doesn't always give meaningful
results as indicated here:
http://osdir.com/ml/lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs/2006-09/msg8.html
and here:
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 10:19 +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
Magicloud Magiclouds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
static int old;
int diff (int now) { /* this would be called once a second */
int ret = now - old;
old = now;
return ret;
}
Because there is no variable in Haskell. So
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:37 +, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 5:11 AM, Stuart Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago I wrote a little data structure that allows weighted
random selection-without-replacement from a collection of values in
O(log n) time.[1] I'm now in the process
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:29 +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
1. Small examples of actual code. The goal here is (a) to convey a
visceral idea of what functional programming *is*, rather than just
assume the audience knows (they don't), and (b) to convey an idea of
why it might be good.
Hello,
