From some of the reports in the press, the problem was that the trades were
supposed to be spread out over several days or weeks, but were spread over
hours instead. So, if that were true, no type system would be of any help.
The US Navy had a similar problem on a propulsion control system back
Ertugrul:
I might be missing something in translation, but if I understand Takayuki's
message's intent, everything needs to be calculated because the C-based
FFTW library is called (eventually). Laziness doesn't really have an impact.
The choice of underlying data structure and whether FFTW
It's a side effect of dynamic linking, or, lack of support for it in ghci. You
can't work around it. I've tried.
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 27, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Alexander Bau a...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote:
GHCi and cabal didn't work, but ghc --make did.
Neither GHCi, cabal nor ghc --make
Disclaimer: I'm not looking to start a favorite IDE flame war, or resurrect
Emacs vs. VIM vs. Yi vs. insert your favorite IDE here discussions.
I've been helping JP with EclipseFP, with the objective of evolving
EclipseFP into a relatively high productivity IDE for Haskell. EclipseFP
has the
Whatever happened to the JVM backend for GHC? That might actually be a
relatively straightforward solution to the whole interface to Java
problem.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
liamoc:
On 19 April 2010 05:29, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
That's
Off topic, but funny:
http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programmer-views-users.html
The Haskell icon is very apt!
-scooter
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
To have it defined is one thing. To actually implement i128 and i256 is
quite another thing. Are you willing to actually do all of the work
necessary to implement the unboxed i128 code?
Dream away!
2009/10/22 Maurício CA mauricio.antu...@gmail.com
Hi,
Do you think we could have the range
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Dan Doeldan.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, I replied too hastily.
What I wrote in my first mail is a problem, as witnessed by the ix and ix1
in the error message. However, it isn't the main error. The main error is that
you have a monadic expression, with type
I'm trying to get my mind around how to thaw and then freeze a UArray.
Theoretically, what I've written below should be a no-op, but I keep
getting typing errors that I can't figure out. GHCI 6.10.3 says:
Couldn't match expected type `UArray ix a'
against inferred type `ST s (STUArray
