e are a lot of ways
> to tackle it, but I think you need to elaborate a bit more on what is
> needed. If you want to maintain the "object graph" structure, you'll
> treat the problem quite a bit differently than if you are happy to
> convert it to a pure data structure.
&
Thanks for the links!
I didn't realize that Iteratee can also do random access. I looked at
Oleg's slides a while back, but I haven't wrapped my head around it.
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 08:57 -0500, John Lato wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> > From: david fries
> >
>
Yep, That's what I had in mind. Thanks for the link.
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 19:09 +, Stephen Tetley wrote:
> Hi David
>
> Ah ha - this form of binary file layout is quite common (e.g. PECOFF
> object files and OpenType / TrueType fonts).
>
> Parsec and other parsing libraries are perhaps not
able starts at byte 200
of the file. So now I would jump to that position in the file and start
parsing SubTable. After that I'd jump back and parse the remaining
fields of the root table.
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 16:23 +, Stephen Tetley wrote:
> On 14 March 2010 16:03, david fries wrot
Dear Caféistas
I desperately need your collective knowledge I have been working on
porting the haskell-platform to the FreeBSD operating system for a while
now and some versioning issues have come up.
FreeBSD is still running on GHC-6.10.4 (6.12 is in the works). The ghc
package contains a coupl
Hello Café
Some time ago I wrote a parser for a project of one our customers. The
format was proprietary and binary. The data was structured as a tree
with tables pointing to sub tables farther in the file. (Well actually
there was one or two cases where branches joined together, so I guess it
was
Hey everybody
I've been playing around with Parsec a little bit lately. I like it a
lot, but now I've hit a bit of a challenge. Suppose I have to parse a
variable length string representing a time interval. Depending on how
many fields there are, the time is either interpreted as seconds,
minutes
Hi everyone
I recently started porting cabal-install to Freebsd. When I looked at its
dependencies on hackage, I noticed HTTP (>=4000.0.2 && <4001). However the
latest HTTP version on hackage is 4000.0.8. That struck me as kinda odd. How
can cabal tell that it won't be compatible with HTTP vers
