bang gives an imperative
flavor.
Other suggestions would be welcome.
Ezra
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 01:47 AM, o...@okmij.org wrote:
I have also had problems with non-termination, unintended recursion.
The problem is not caught statically and leads to looping, which may
be quite difficult
in Data.List and force people to qualify as
necessary, or (b) choose another name for flip map.
Regarding other possible names: forall is a keyword and forAll is used
by QuickCheck. One possibility would be foreach.
Ezra
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012, at 10:19 PM, Christopher Done wrote:
On 28 March 2012 22:05
that helps--
Ezra
On Friday, September 23, 2011 4:22 AM, mukesh tiwari
mukeshtiwari.ii...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all
I have a data type
data Index = Index {indexSize::Float, indexIds::[Int],
indexDown::(IntMap.IntMap Index)}
| IndexLeaf {indexSize::Float, indexIds::[Int
described as calculi--that they have some form of
name-binders, but I have never seen that observation written down.
I'm sure that an algebraist could give a more definite answer about this.
Ezra
On Aug 23, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Rajesh S R srrajesh1...@gmail.com wrote:
Slight digression. Why
. That is, an end user
is able to manipulate the text of a Haskell module simply by point-and-click
mouse operations on displayed values.
Pen and paper work too.
Ezra.
Ulrik Rasmussen-2 wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone has written a tracer/debugger that shows you
how a given Haskell
; if somebody with some more experience would chime in, that'd
be awesome. ;)
Ezra
dima.neg wrote:
How can I do this using foldr?
searchList p [] = Nothing
searchList p (x:xs)
| p x = Just (x:filter p xs)
| otherwise = searchList p xs
I try
, we also get the following:
*Main toTuple Ezra
('E',4)
But that won't matter if we only use it after toList, as in compress.
Also, I've used your type signature for my solution, not your example
output; if you want it to be displayed like that, you'll have to write your
own function for printing
) but it will not immediately force the
evaluation of (join xs). That part stays as it is, living life as a
thunk, until the caller has demanded all the preceding elements and
still wants more.
hth,
Ezra
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http
Gregory,
Church-Rosser is proved in any good text on lambda calculus, such as
Barendregt [1]. Some rather detailed notes on that book are at [2].
Lazy evaluation is often formalized as call-by-need. Try [3].
Ezra
[1] Barendregt. The Lambda Calculus
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN
