This sounds like a request for homework help.
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Homework_help
Mike
Luis Felipe wrote:
Hi,
I need help to develop an implementation of nim game in Haskell.
Could anyone send me a implementation of this game in haskell??
thanks
__
I prefer the terms "awesome" and "crappy", respectively, but sure, whatever
works for you ;-)
Mike
Henning Thielemann wrote:
Here is another approach of questionable classification of languages. :-)
A lazy functional program is demand driven, an imperative program is
supply driven. That is,
Does anyone know where I could find the source code for the Haskell web server
described in the papers "Tackling the Awkward Squad" by SPJ and "Writing
High-Performance Server Applications in Haskell, Case Study: A Haskell Web
Server" by Simon Marlow?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
A good follow-up is "The Haskell School of Expression" by Paul Hudak.
Eventually, though, you're going to have to start reading research papers, which
is where most of the cutting-edge stuff is. Phil Wadler's papers (available
from his web site, just google it) are a good place to start, as are
As opposed to what?
Mike
Mike Gunter wrote:
I had hoped the "History of Haskell" paper would answer a question
I've pondered for some time: why does Haskell have the if-then-else
syntax? The paper doesn't address this. What's the story?
thanks,
-m
Lemmih wrote:
On 7/25/06, mvanier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I was playing around with runhaskell (runghc to be precise), and I
discovered
the limitation wherein you have to use the file suffix ".hs". Don't
get me
wrong, runhaskell is great, but if you didn'
Hi,
I was playing around with runhaskell (runghc to be precise), and I discovered
the limitation wherein you have to use the file suffix ".hs". Don't get me
wrong, runhaskell is great, but if you didn't have that restriction it would
make haskell much more attractive to many programmers who w
uture direction...
Mike
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:45:57PM -0700, mvanier wrote:
I'm at a loss here. Somehow, the SplitObjs option doesn't seem to be doing
the job. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
It looks like gcc 4.1 is floating all the
__asm__("
aries didn't get
rebuilt with split objs ?
mvanier:
I've tried doing a manual build with SplitObjs set to YES, but without
success; either the compiler was broken or it would still generate large
executables. So as a sanity check, I installed the debian unstable build.
But that one als
I've been reading Phil Wadler's monad papers from the early '90s, and it's been
interesting to see how the monad concept evolved over the course of those years.
But I haven't been able to track down the first use of the "do" notation for
monads. Can anyone tell me where that came from? I'd ap
10 matches
Mail list logo