I wonder if Bulat Ziganshin's FreeARC software could serve as a back-
end to the filestore API, and if it did what sort of time and space
performance it would have.
And if it was good, then I wonder if it could then be used by
darcs. :-)
Regards,
Zooko
On Jan 24, 2009, at 17:19 PM
Hi there! I have the same problem. The machine is running Ubuntu 7.04 x86.
ghc is v6.6 as provided by Ubuntu -- the Ubuntu version number is 6.6-3.
The complete cabal-bin command-line, as executed by make, is:
/home/zooko/playground/ghc/ghc-6.10.1/libraries/cabal-bin /usr/bin/ghc
/home/zooko
) and the
publicly-readable repository for that package (if any).
Thanks!
Regards,
Zooko
---
http://allmydata.org -- Tahoe, the Least-Authority Filesystem
http://allmydata.com -- back up all your files for $10/month
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe
,
Zooko
http://allmydata.org -- Tahoe, the Least-Authority Filesystem
http://allmydata.com -- back up all your files for $5/month
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
://haskell.org/bz
There might be some interesting advantages that a revision control
tool could gain with the use of a good compression tool like that...
Regards,
Zooko
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org
Hooray for the release of darcs-2!
Way to go, David!
Regards,
Zooko
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
.
Regards,
Zooko
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
for the
implementation difficulty (of which I know little), any other option
would provide a better trade-off.
Regards,
Zooko
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
following-up to my own post:
On Jan 24, 2008, at 1:15 PM, zooko wrote:
So, let me see if I understand the issues here.
...
2. It would be nice, but isn't currently used, if one could rely
on the property that for a given patch id, nobody can come up with
another patch that has the same
and safer (although not safe against a quantum computer).
SHA-1 is the worst of both worlds -- slow and unsafe.
Regards,
Zooko
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
/archives/2005/08/new_cryptanalyt.html
Regards,
Zooko
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
behavior on the part of some malicious actor that darcs
tries to prevent, such that the collision-resistance (such as it is)
of SHA-1 is necessary to prevent it?
Regards,
Zooko
[1] http://cryptopp.com/benchmarks.html
[2] http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/zfs_end_to_end_data
.
(If you need a secure hash function, Tiger is probably stronger than,
and is 150% as fast as, SHA-1.)
Regards,
Zooko
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
have to agonize about putting everything
in the right place and the start and then live with it for years or undergo
painful transitions.
Regards,
Zooko
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
14 matches
Mail list logo
