On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 23:24 +0200, Marc A. Ziegert wrote:
> i interpret it as this:
>
> all [ usage x > usage y || fun_to_talk_about x > fun_to_talk_about y
> | let lang=[minBound .. maxBound] -- C++,Haskell,Java,etc.
> , x<-lang
> , y<-lang
> , irc_channel_users x > irc_channel_us
i interpret it as this:
all [ usage x > usage y || fun_to_talk_about x > fun_to_talk_about y
| let lang=[minBound .. maxBound] -- C++,Haskell,Java,etc.
, x<-lang
, y<-lang
, irc_channel_users x > irc_channel_users y
]
- marc
Am Dienstag, 21. August 2007 schrieb Albert Y. C
Andrew Coppin wrote:
...does this mean Haskell is officially harder to understand than Lisp,
Java, Perl and O'Caml? :-}
(OTOH, does this mean Haskell is easier to understand than PHP or C++?)
Or, Haskell is the easiest to understand of them all.
Reason: Extremely large channel means so hard
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
This puts the channel at around the 13th largest community of the 5500
freenode channels. For comparision, a sample of the state of the other
language communities:
#php 485
#perl472
##c++457
##c 445
#python 430
A small announcement :)
5 1/2 years after its inception, under the guiding hand of Shae Erisson
(aka shapr), the #haskell IRC channel[1] on freenode has finally reached
400 users!
To chart the growth, we can note that the channel was founded
in late 2001, and had slow growth till 2006, reachin