On 2/26/07, Chris Eidhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey everyone,
we added some examples to this page. There are some topics that don't
have any examples, notably:
# 11 Network Programming
# 12 XML
* 12.1 Parsing XML
# 13 Databases
* 13.1 MySQL
* 13.2 PostgreSQL
* 13.3 SQLite
Hey everyone,
we added some examples to this page. There are some topics that don't
have any examples, notably:
# 11 Network Programming
# 12 XML
* 12.1 Parsing XML
# 13 Databases
* 13.1 MySQL
* 13.2 PostgreSQL
* 13.3 SQLite
# 14 FFI
* 14.1 How to interface with C
If
On Fri, 2007-23-02 at 02:24 -0500, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:
Call me a technophile, but it saddens me that ASCII has already held us
back for too many decades, and looks like it will still hold us back for
another.
OK. You're a technophile. But I agree with you. ASCII needs to die a
slow,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:09:15 +, you wrote:
Well, actually, I never cited the non-breaking space character as a
problem.
Well, actually, you did:
Symbols such as the 160 used liberally in the Haskell wikibook are
totally invisible to screen readers.
#160; = NO BREAK SPACE
Which is why I
So that's what it is! I wondered why alt-num-0160 only produced a
space character. Still, as I said originally, it is totally invisible
in the browse buffer.
Anyway, are you one of the authors of the wikibook Or, are you just
offering your assistance?
All the best
Paul
At 19:03 23/02/2007,
P. R. Stanley wrote:
I'm referring to math symbols which do not get successfully
translated into an intelligible symbol in the screen reader browse buffer.
Is there a way to make the symbols both look right on a screen and sound
right from a screen reader? E.g.,
span title=big sigmaΣ/span
On 23/02/07, P. R. Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a tip for anyone involved in writing and publishing scientific
materials on the web, unless the maths is either written without any
funny symbols or, better still, typeset in latex, it is not
accessible to a screen-reader.
I was under the
As a tip for anyone involved in writing and publishing scientific
materials on the web, unless the maths is either written without any
funny symbols or, better still, typeset in latex, it is not
accessible to a screen-reader.
I was under the impression that modern screen readers could
Is there a way to make the symbols both look right on a screen and sound
right from a screen reader? E.g.,
span title=big sigmaΣ/span !-- there's a U+03A3 in there --
In theory the title attribute should be the
adequate yet simple solution we're after. Sadly,
in reality this 'aint the
Call me a technophile, but it saddens me that ASCII has already held us
back for too many decades, and looks like it will still hold us back for
another.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
and can I please ask anyone thinking of using special symbols to
resist the temptation.
Symbols such as the 160 used liberally in the Haskell wikibook are
totally invisible to screen readers.
I would be happy to proof read any document before it goes to the
wikibook to ensure it's fully
I second this plea.
-- Jeff
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 22:34, P. R. Stanley wrote:
and can I please ask anyone thinking of using special symbols to
resist the temptation.
Symbols such as the 160 used liberally in the Haskell wikibook are
totally invisible to screen readers.
I would be
12 matches
Mail list logo
