Very true. I oversimplified matters by mistake.
One question, I suppose, is does seq distinguish the arrows, or does it
distinguish the exponential objects in the category? since you are using it
as an object in order to apply seq, and does that distinction matter? I'd
hazard not, but its curious
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Edward Kmett wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Edward Kmett wrote:
>>
>> -- as long as you're ignoring 'seq'
>> terminateSeq :: a -> Unit
>> terminateSeq a = a `seq` unit
>>
>
> Er ignore that language about seq. a `seq` unit is either another bottom o
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Edward Kmett wrote:
>
> -- as long as you're ignoring 'seq'
> terminateSeq :: a -> Unit
> terminateSeq a = a `seq` unit
>
>
Er ignore that language about seq. a `seq` unit is either another bottom or
undefined, so there remains one canonical morphism even in the
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
>
> Of course the are still a lot of things missing, especially in the details.
> And I'm a category theory beginner, so there will probably be some mistakes
> in there as well. F.e. Edward Kmett doesn't like () being the terminal
> object i
Hi everybody,
At ZuriHac I released data-category. It is an implementation of several
category-theoretical constructions.
I started this library to learn about both category theory and type level
programming, so I wanted to implement the CT concepts as directly as possible.
This in contrast to
