Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 2.8.0 -> HTML vs. XHTML

2010-09-06 Thread Christopher Done
On 6 September 2010 17:11, Mark Lentczner wrote: > On Sep 6, 2010, at 2:40 AM, Henning Thielemann wrote: >> ... focusing on a small set of assumed popular browsers ... > > I didn't want to assume either. I ran a survey of the Haskell community and > got over a 150 responses. > On Sep 6, 2010, at

Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 2.8.0 -> HTML vs. XHTML

2010-09-06 Thread Mark Lentczner
On Sep 6, 2010, at 2:40 AM, Henning Thielemann wrote: > ... focusing on a small set of assumed popular browsers ... I didn't want to assume either. I ran a survey of the Haskell community and got over a 150 responses. The multiple choice browser question yielded: Firefox: 59% Chr

Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 2.8.0 -> HTML vs. XHTML

2010-09-06 Thread Henning Thielemann
Mark Lentczner schrieb: > The choice to generate Haddock output as XHTML 1.0 Transitional and Frames, > stored into files with an extension of .html, and that would likely be served > as text/html, was mine and I did so with review of current best practices. > The output Haddock now generates r