For a project I'm working on, I got sick of writing out trees by hand.
Data.Tree has a drawTree function, but whilst it's better than
nothing, I prefer a more top-down traditional approach to drawing
trees.
So I wrote a package to do just that:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pretty-tree
(I
The idea is pretty good, although I suggest you make clickable the
Haddock's link to modules, because I had to navigate the source in order to
find some application
as well as nice tree visualizations :)
Cheers,
A.
On 26 October 2012 14:58, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.comwrote:
Which links _aren't_ clickable? If you mean the one to diagrams-contrib,
since it isn't imported I can't link to that module directly.
One thing I just realised: compared to drawTrees, drawVerticalTree reverses
the direction of sub-trees (in that it isn't just equivalent to rotating it
clockwise
I think Alfredo meant the link to module's haddock which had not been
generated when you sent out the announcement.
Roman
* Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com [2012-10-27 07:37:10+1100]
Which links _aren't_ clickable? If you mean the one to diagrams-contrib,
since it isn't
Iavor's pretty-show package is quite handy for these kind of tasks as well.
Highly recommended: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pretty-show
Since Iavor package is not tree-centric, it'll probably not generate as
nice output as you can for real tree-like-data. However, since it works on
