On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:47:39AM +0200, Michael Snoyman wrote:
By the way, a native zlib implementation would definitely go on my
wishlist. Any takers? ;)
Me too ! that's the only thing that prevented me from adding the
* Donn Cave:
Quoth Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de,
wikipedia: Managed code is a differentiation coined by Microsoft to
identify computer program code that requires and will only execute
under the management of a Common Language Runtime virtual machine
(resulting in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/9/10 09:17 , Malcolm Wallace wrote:
On 8 Oct 2010, at 16:56, Donn Cave wrote:
wikipedia: Managed code is a differentiation coined by Microsoft to
identify computer program code that requires and will only execute
under the
On 8 October 2010 07:44, C K Kashyap ckkash...@gmail.com wrote:
Does native mean Haskell only - without FFI?
I think not Haskell would be piping to a separate non-Haskell
process or calling by FFI to another language to do the interesting
work. Thus native is not using these for the interesting
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Christopher Done
chrisd...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2010 07:44, C K Kashyap ckkash...@gmail.com wrote:
Does native mean Haskell only - without FFI?
I think not Haskell would be piping to a separate non-Haskell
process or calling by FFI to another
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:14:01AM +0530, C K Kashyap wrote:
Does native mean Haskell only - without FFI?
Native means the implementation is in haskell, and the library is not using
another implementation (in another language) to do the work: either through FFI
as a binding, or as a wrapper to
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:47:39AM +0200, Michael Snoyman wrote:
By the way, a native zlib implementation would definitely go on my
wishlist. Any takers? ;)
Me too ! that's the only thing that prevented me from adding the compression
layer to TLS. as such it's on my todo list, but really really
* Vincent Hanquez:
Native means the implementation is in haskell, and the library is
not using another implementation (in another language) to do the
work: either through FFI as a binding, or as a wrapper to an
external program.
I can see how this terminology makes sense, but it's the
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Vincent Hanquez:
Native means the implementation is in haskell, and the library is
not using another implementation (in another language) to do the
work: either through FFI as a binding, or as a wrapper to an
external
Quoth Bas van Dijk v.dijk@gmail.com,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
...
I can see how this terminology makes sense, but it's the opposite of
the usage in Java (where native == unmanaged code called via JNI).
I guess it depends on the context. If
* Donn Cave:
wikipedia: Managed code is a differentiation coined by Microsoft to
identify computer program code that requires and will only execute
under the management of a Common Language Runtime virtual machine
(resulting in Bytecode).
I like this term, I apply it by
Quoth Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de,
wikipedia: Managed code is a differentiation coined by Microsoft to
identify computer program code that requires and will only execute
under the management of a Common Language Runtime virtual machine
(resulting in Bytecode).
I like this
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:29:51AM +0200, Christopher Done wrote:
On 6 October 2010 23:26, Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org wrote:
I'ld like to announce the tls package [1][2], which is a native
implementation
of the TLS protocol, client and server. It's currently mostly supporting
SSL3,
Does native mean Haskell only - without FFI?
--
Regards,
Kashyap
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hi haskellers,
I'ld like to announce the tls package [1][2], which is a native implementation
of the TLS protocol, client and server. It's currently mostly supporting SSL3,
TLS1.0 and TLS1.1. It's got *lots* of rough edges, and a bunch of unsupported
features, but it's humming along, and at
On 6 October 2010 23:26, Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org wrote:
I'ld like to announce the tls package [1][2], which is a native implementation
of the TLS protocol, client and server. It's currently mostly supporting
SSL3,
TLS1.0 and TLS1.1. It's got *lots* of rough edges, and a bunch of
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Christopher Done
chrisd...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 6 October 2010 23:26, Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org wrote:
I'ld like to announce the tls package [1][2], which is a native
implementation
of the TLS protocol, client and server. It's currently mostly
17 matches
Mail list logo
