On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:10, Max Rabkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:59, Jason Dagit wrote:
>> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>>
>>> Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
>>> packages?
>>
>> I don't think so. It looks to be almost identi
* Jason Dagit [2011-05-09 01:59:46-0700]
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> > Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
> > packages?
> >
>
> I don't think so. It looks to be almost identical to using BSD3, which is
> already quite popular for ha
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:59, Jason Dagit wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>> Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
>> packages?
>
> I don't think so. It looks to be almost identical to using BSD3, which is
> already quite popular for h
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
> packages?
>
I don't think so. It looks to be almost identical to using BSD3, which is
already quite popular for haskellers.
This seems like a good write up of the apache l
Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
packages?
/M
--
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I
