Hi,
let me chime in as someone who wanted to deploy a Haskell app on a
fairly popular hosting environment (Slicehost).
The support of GHC on the Ubuntu server front is tragic - there's no
official Haskell Platform for the currently suggested server version
of Ubuntu, which is Ubuntu 10.04 LTS ("Lon
"John D. Ramsdell" writes:
> Developers should be using older versions of GHC because they cannot
> be sure users will have an up-to-date GHC.
I wonder, how hard would it be to have, say Amazon images of various
Linux distributions with ghc and cabal-install available? Currently, I
have a dis
"Dmitri O.Kondratiev" writes:
>> Let me know if you would like opinions on Emacs vs vi!
>
> I know vi, but it is just that I got used to Emacs which is my main IDE for
> most PL that I work with and for many years already )
No, no! Stop, it was just a joke, really. I regret it already. :-)
-k
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Ketil Malde wrote:
> "Dmitri O.Kondratiev" writes:
>
>> Which platform - Mac OS X, Linux or Win32 is best for development with GHC
>> today?
>
>> How are things with Ubuntu?
>
> I use Ubuntu. Most stuff is fairly up-to-date, but even with six-month
> releases, it
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:49 AM, kaffeepause73 wrote:
> Its also worth looking at Arch Linux - they have a rolling release and are
> therefore
> very up to date and have from first glance a very good haskell integration.
> The community
> is excellent as well.
>
>
Arch Linux is my development dist
Its also worth looking at Arch Linux - they have a rolling release and are
therefore
very up to date and have from first glance a very good haskell integration.
The community
is excellent as well.
I switched back to debian squeeze however, because of its stability - update
seldomly cause trouble
*Ketil Malde* ketil at malde.org
writes:
> I use Ubuntu. Most stuff is fairly up-to-date, but even with six-month
releases, it's lagging the cutting edge, and GHC is still 6.12. Thus, I tend
to install development stuff via Cabal these days, which at least partly
evens out the playing ground betwe
"Dmitri O.Kondratiev" writes:
> Which platform - Mac OS X, Linux or Win32 is best for development with GHC
> today?
I think most developers use Linux, which tends to ensure that more stuff
will work there. Most developers will also tend to use recent versions
of everything, so go with Fedora or
I don't know about the other Linux distros, but Fedora seems to have excellent
support for Haskell.
Michael___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
2011/6/15 Dmitri O.Kondratiev
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Henning Thielemann
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Dmitri O.Kondratiev wrote:
>>
>>> Which platform - Mac OS X, Linux or Win32 is best for development with GHC
>>> today?
>>> How are things with Ubuntu? It was quite a whil
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Henning Thielemann <
lemm...@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Dmitri O.Kondratiev wrote:
>
> Which platform - Mac OS X, Linux or Win32 is best for development with GHC
>> today?
>> How are things with Ubuntu? It was quite a while already that
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Dmitri O.Kondratiev wrote:
Which platform - Mac OS X, Linux or Win32 is best for development with GHC
today?
How are things with Ubuntu? It was quite a while already that I used Haskell on
Linux. Today I have to code on Win32 and Mac OS
X. Installing extra libraries caus
Which platform - Mac OS X, Linux or Win32 is best for development with GHC
today?
How are things with Ubuntu? It was quite a while already that I used Haskell
on Linux. Today I have to code on Win32 and Mac OS X. Installing extra
libraries caused most of the pains for me on Win32 - for example GTK
13 matches
Mail list logo
