Günther Schmidt wrote:
...*I*
have managed to write code that ghc is not even able to compile due to
exhausting virtual memory!
Top that!
Good work Günther!
Joe Fredette wrote:
Code or it didn't happen. :)
Yes, how did you do it?
Did it involve very large literals? GHC is known to have
Hi guys,
actually it involved haskelldb and a table that had 183 columns. In
order to specify the table with its 183 columns I had to increase the
context-stack slightly from 20 to a mere 190.
Günther
BTW there is one thing I find a bit unfortunate in otherwise flawless
haskelldb, each
Hi folks,
I would like to announce that I have not merely managed to make the RTS
choke during runtime on stack overflows like lesser programmers, no, *I*
have managed to write code that ghc is not even able to compile due to
exhausting virtual memory!
Top that!
Günther
Code or it didn't happen. :)
Günther Schmidt wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to announce that I have not merely managed to make the
RTS choke during runtime on stack overflows like lesser programmers,
no, *I* have managed to write code that ghc is not even able to
compile due to exhausting
