On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 18:16 -0600, Tom Tobin wrote:
I noticed on Hackage that packages that are MIT licensed show up as
OtherLicense. I took a peek inside the Cabal code, and noticed that
the License type has lines for MIT, but commented out [1]:
---- | The MIT license, similar to the
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
So the reason it's there commented out in the Cabal-1.6 code you're
looking at is to remind us to uncomment it for Cabal-1.8 (which it now
is, along with the versioned (L)GPL licenses).
Ahh, okay. (I love when
I noticed on Hackage that packages that are MIT licensed show up as
OtherLicense. I took a peek inside the Cabal code, and noticed that
the License type has lines for MIT, but commented out [1]:
---- | The MIT license, similar to the BSD3. Very free license.
-- | MIT
Why is this? Both