On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 10:38 +0100, Sean Leather wrote:
>
> Presumably the template-haskell-2.3 package does not build
> with ghc-6.8
> but fails to correctly specify the version of base or ghc that
> it
> requires. If it did then we would have a better chanc
> Presumably the template-haskell-2.3 package does not build with ghc-6.8
> but fails to correctly specify the version of base or ghc that it
> requires. If it did then we would have a better chance to get this
> right.
>
Yes, this is certainly an issue in general with template-haskell-2.3. How do
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 13:18 +0100, Sean Leather wrote:
> Either I'm doing something wrong or this doesn't work for
> cabal-install and GHC 6.8.3. I used the "flag newer-th" approach in
> EMGM:
>
>
> https://svn.cs.uu.nl:12443/viewvc/dgp-haskell/EMGM/tags/emgm-0.2/emgm.cabal?view=markup
>
> [...
Hi,
I'm bringing up an old thread, because it's very relevant to my problem.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 22:30, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 01:48 -0800, Jason Dusek wrote:
> > I'd like to be able to do something like:
> >
> > if (template-haskell < 2.3)
> > cpp-options: -D
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 02:15 -0800, Jason Dusek wrote:
> Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jason Dusek wrote:
> > > In the ticket, someone says:
> > >
> > > True though I suspect it looks a bit weird to the
> > > uninitiated. We know to read the conditional syntax as an
> > > implicati
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Dusek wrote:
> > In the ticket, someone says:
> >
> > True though I suspect it looks a bit weird to the
> > uninitiated. We know to read the conditional syntax as an
> > implication constraint which can be applied in either
> > direction but I su
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 16:53 -0800, Jason Dusek wrote:
> In the ticket, someone says:
>
> True though I suspect it looks a bit weird to the
> uninitiated. We know to read the conditional syntax as an
> implication constraint which can be applied in either
> direction but I suspect m
In the ticket, someone says:
True though I suspect it looks a bit weird to the
uninitiated. We know to read the conditional syntax as an
implication constraint which can be applied in either
direction but I suspect many people read it in a directed
functional way.
Does tha
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 01:48 -0800, Jason Dusek wrote:
> I'd like to be able to do something like:
>
> if (template-haskell < 2.3)
> cpp-options: -D TH_THE_YOUNGER
> else
> cpp-options: -D TH_THE_ELDER
>
> I guess this kind of thing is not possible at present?
It is possible
I'd like to be able to do something like:
if (template-haskell < 2.3)
cpp-options: -D TH_THE_YOUNGER
else
cpp-options: -D TH_THE_ELDER
I guess this kind of thing is not possible at present?
--
_jsn
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo
