On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:14 PM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
On 6/23/11 4:30 PM, Alexander Solla wrote:
Please read Fast and Loose Reasoning is Morally Correct.
http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/people/jeremy.gibbons/publications/fast+loose.pdf
As I have told you before, it is
Tjhis presentation has been very useful for me:
Category Theory for software engineers,.
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~sme/presentations/cat101.pdf
It is an excelent introduction using basic notations (graphs). It
includes Applying category theory to specifications and Tools
based on category
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Gregg Reynolds d...@mobileink.com wrote:
Well, you're way ahead of me. I don't even get adjunctions, to tell you
the truth. By which I mean that I have no intuition about them; it's not so
hard to understand the formal definition, but it's another thing
On 6/23/11 1:39 AM, Arnaud Bailly wrote:
Of course, we can always say that each
system is a language of its own (rather than *has* a language...) which is
what Eric Evans coined with its Ubiquitous language term. But I find it
difficult to connect that particular dots.
That's certainly my
On 11-06-22 12:30 AM, Arnaud Bailly wrote:
Are there works/thesis/books/articles/blogs that try to use Cat.
theory explicitly as a tool/language for designing software (not as an
underlying formalisation or semantics)? Is the question even
meaningful?
A lot of Doug Smith's works. In short, an
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:15 PM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
To put a different spin on it, in the dual case we can show that Haskell's
(,) is not a categorical product. There's a good deal of historical debate
about why it works the way it does, but if we're looking to make a
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:15 PM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.orgwrote:
On 6/23/11 1:39 AM, Arnaud Bailly wrote:
Of course, we can always say that each
system is a language of its own (rather than *has* a language...) which
is
what Eric Evans coined with its Ubiquitous language term.
On 6/23/11 4:30 PM, Alexander Solla wrote:
Please read Fast and Loose Reasoning is Morally Correct.
http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/people/jeremy.gibbons/publications/fast+loose.pdf
As I have told you before, it is perfectly appropriate to ignore
bottom-the-type and bottoms-the-inexpressible
Hi Arnaud,
I'm not the best person to answer this question, and I'm not certain this
constitutes an answer, but you might be interested in Conal Elliott's paper
Denotational design with type class morphisms available at
http://conal.net/papers/type-class-morphisms/.
Sebastien
On Tue, Jun 21,
On 22 June 2011 05:30, Arnaud Bailly arnaud.oq...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there works/thesis/books/articles/blogs that try to use Cat.
theory explicitly as a tool/language for designing software (not as an
underlying formalisation or semantics)? Is the question even
meaningful?
You might find
Thanks Sebastien,
This paper has passed in my radar's field but I must confess that
although I think I grasped the idea, I was quickly lost in the
profusion of symbols and notations. I am no mathematician, only a
simple developer, although I am fascinated by several topics in
mathematics so my
Thanks Stephen, looks interesting and congruent with few a priori I
had in mind. I have already seen in prior life connections between
modeling, MOF and category theory.
Regards
Arnaud
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Stephen Tetley
stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 June 2011 05:30, Arnaud
We have a saying in french for that which translates approximately to
turn your tongue seven times in your mouth before speaking.
That's what happen when one tries to type mails and have breakfast at
the same time :-)
Cheers
Arnaud
2011/6/22 MigMit miguelim...@yandex.ru:
I remember myself
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Arnaud Bailly arnaud.oq...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Sebastien,
This paper has passed in my radar's field but I must confess that
although I think I grasped the idea, I was quickly lost in the
profusion of symbols and notations. I am no mathematician, only a
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Arnaud Bailly arnaud.oq...@gmail.com
wrote:
(2nd try, took my gloves off...)
Hello Café,
I have been fascinated by Cat. theory for quite a few years now, as
most people who get close to it I think.
I am a developer, working mostly in Java for my living and
Hello Greg and Alexander,
Thanks for your replies. Funnily, I happen to own the 3 books you mentionned
:-) My interest in category theory is a long standing affair...
Note that owning a book, having read (most of) it and knowing a theory (or
at least its principles and main concepts) is really
On 6/22/11 3:59 PM, Arnaud Bailly wrote:
Hello Greg and Alexander,
Thanks for your replies. Funnily, I happen to own the 3 books you
mentionned
:-) My interest in category theory is a long standing affair...
Note that owning a book, having read (most of) it and knowing a theory (or
at least
: Gregg Reynolds d...@mobileink.com
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Category theory as a design tool
To: Arnaud Bailly arnaud.oq...@gmail.com
Cc: Haskell Cafe haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Message-ID: banlktingaplo7ysyggg1duxbw5ik1kl...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On Tue
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Arnaud Bailly arnaud.oq...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Greg and Alexander,
Thanks for your replies. Funnily, I happen to own the 3 books you
mentionned :-) My interest in category theory is a long standing affair...
Note that owning a book, having read (most of) it
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Gregg Reynolds d...@mobileink.com wrote:
Well, you're way ahead of me. I don't even get adjunctions, to tell you
the truth. By which I mean that I have no intuition about them; it's not so
hard to understand the formal definition, but it's another thing
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:46 PM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.orgwrote:
One of the big benefits I see to using category theory for dealing with
programming languages comes from using CT as a generalized logic for
equational reasoning. In particular, making use of the ideas of (co)limits
Hello,
I ha
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hey, I think you forgo
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Arnaud Bailly arnaud.oq...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I ha
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
(2nd try, took my gloves off...)
Hello Café,
I have been fascinated by Cat. theory for quite a few years now, as
most people who get close to it I think.
I am a developer, working mostly in Java for my living and dabbling
with haskell and scala in my spare time and assuming the frustration
of
On 22/06/2011 2:24 PM, Daniel Peebles wrote:
Hey, I think you forgo
Hahah, this reminds me of the time I onc
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Funny, I didn't hear anyone say Candlejack. What abou
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
I remember myself complaining about how when one says something stupid and
corrects himself in a few minutes, it's the first message that attracts all the
attention, not the second one.
Отправлено с iPhone
Jun 22, 2011, в 8:42, Alex Rozenshteyn rpglove...@gmail.com написал(а):
Funny, I
27 matches
Mail list logo
