Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Iâm consdering to change some performance critical code from Vector to
> MVector, hopefully avoiding a lot of copying and garbage collecting. But
> it seems that the Data.Vector.Mutable interface at
> http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/vector/0.9/doc/htm
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 20.10.2011, 23:10 +0200 schrieb Ertugrul Soeylemez:
> In general you should try to work with immutable vectors as much as
> possible. Done properly you shouldn't lose much performance that way.
>
> However, sometimes an operation is just much easier to express and
> faster
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I’m consdering to change some performance critical code from Vector to
> MVector, hopefully avoiding a lot of copying and garbage collecting. But
> it seems that the Data.Vector.Mutable interface at
> http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/vector/0.9/doc/html/Data-V
Hi,
I’m consdering to change some performance critical code from Vector to
MVector, hopefully avoiding a lot of copying and garbage collecting. But
it seems that the Data.Vector.Mutable interface at
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/vector/0.9/doc/html/Data-Vector-Mutable.html
is quite
