Hi,
While I agree that the documentation of Data.Generics is not perfect, I do
not think it is possible to have the haddock documentation be
self-contained. For a thorough understanding of syb, a user has to read the
two initial papers, which are linked from the haddock documentation. I also
do
Hi John,
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 14:58, John Lato wrote:
For anyone writing introductions to generic programming, take this as
a plea from Haskellers everywhere. If one of the RWH authors can't
understand how to make use of these techniques, what hope do the rest
of us have?
I would like
For anyone writing introductions to generic programming, take this as
a plea from Haskellers everywhere. If one of the RWH authors can't
understand how to make use of these techniques, what hope do the rest
of us have?
John Lato
P.S. Some might wryly note that I'm the maintainer of a package
On 11 Oct 2009, at 13:58, John Lato wrote:
For anyone writing introductions to generic programming, take this as
a plea from Haskellers everywhere. If one of the RWH authors can't
understand how to make use of these techniques, what hope do the rest
of us have?
John Lato
P.S. Some might
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Iain Barnett iainsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 Oct 2009, at 13:58, John Lato wrote:
For anyone writing introductions to generic programming, take this as
a plea from Haskellers everywhere. If one of the RWH authors can't
understand how to make use of these
