On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jose Iborra wrote:
> You may want to take a look at another option in Hackage, the
> control-monad-exception package.
I've tried using the package; you can see the results at this github branch:
http://github.com/snoyberg/data-object/blob/control-monad-exception
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Nicolas Pouillard
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Michael Snoyman
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Nicolas Pouillard
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Nicolas Pouillard <
nicolas.pouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Michael Snoyman
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Nicolas Pouillard
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Michael Snoyman
> >> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Nicolas Pouillard
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Michael Snoyman
>> wrote:
>> > While working on the next release of data-object, I wanted to represent
[...]
>> About the name Attem
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Nicolas Pouillard <
nicolas.pouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Michael Snoyman
> wrote:
> > While working on the next release of data-object, I wanted to represent
> some
> > operations that might fail. The typical candidates were:
> >
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> While working on the next release of data-object, I wanted to represent some
> operations that might fail. The typical candidates were:
>
> 1) Maybe
> 2) Either
> 3) Monad
>
> Monad is always iffy because of the often times poorly defined f
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Jose Iborra wrote:
> You may want to take a look at anoother option in Hackage, the
> control-monad-exception package.
>
> http://pepeiborra.github.com/control-monad-exception/
>
> The control-monad-exception library provides the building blocks for
>
> * Explici
You may want to take a look at another option in Hackage, the control-
monad-exception package.
http://pepeiborra.github.com/control-monad-exception/
The control-monad-exception library provides the building blocks for
* Explicitly Typed exceptions (checked or not)
* which are composable
* and
(Sorry, accidently took off cafe.)
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Henning Thielemann <
lemm...@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>
> Does the explicit-exception package provide what you need?
>>
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/explicit-excepti
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, Michael Snoyman wrote:
While working on the next release of data-object, I wanted to represent some
operations
that might fail. The typical candidates were:
1) Maybe
2) Either
3) Monad
Monad is always iffy because of the often times poorly defined fail. Maybe
doesn't
pr
While working on the next release of data-object, I wanted to represent some
operations that might fail. The typical candidates were:
1) Maybe
2) Either
3) Monad
Monad is always iffy because of the often times poorly defined fail. Maybe
doesn't provide any means of reporting what the problem was.
11 matches
Mail list logo