Re: [Haskell-cafe] For consistency; it would be better if the import statement matched the cabal install statement or :m form.

2012-08-15 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
On 15 August 2012 13:04, KC kc1...@gmail.com wrote: :m +Data.Array.Repa.Algorithms.Randomish cabal install repa.algrothms would be more consistent. Why would that be? They look completely different to me... -- -- Regards, KC -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com

[Haskell-cafe] For consistency; it would be better if the import statement matched the cabal install statement or :m form.

2012-08-14 Thread KC
:m +Data.Array.Repa.Algorithms.Randomish cabal install repa.algrothms would be more consistent. -- -- Regards, KC ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] For consistency; it would be better if the import statement matched the cabal install statement or :m form.

2012-08-14 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:04 PM, KC kc1...@gmail.com wrote: :m +Data.Array.Repa.Algorithms.Randomish cabal install repa.algrothms would be more consistent. What do you do when multiple modules use the same namespace? (monads-{fd,tf} and the regex modules being cases in point) --