On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 15:34 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
Daniel Kraft asked:
That sounds interesting... What do you mean by no canonical library?
Are there already ones but just no standard one? But in this case,
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2009 16:59 schrieb Brent Yorgey:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 15:34 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
Get a community.haskell.org account once you are ready to start a
repo, it can not only host your repo
g9ks157k:
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2009 16:59 schrieb Brent Yorgey:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 15:34 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
Get a community.haskell.org account once you are ready to start a
repo, it can not only
Don Stewart wrote:
- Graphs.
True graphs (the data structure) are still a weak point! There's no
canonical graph library for Haskell.
That sounds interesting... What do you mean by no canonical library?
Are there already ones but just no standard one? But in this case,
I don't think
Daniel Kraft asked:
That sounds interesting... What do you mean by no canonical library? Are
there already ones but just no standard one? But in this case, I don't
think adding yet another one will help :D Or isn't there a real general
graph library?
My impression is that there is now
Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 15:34 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
Daniel Kraft asked:
That sounds interesting... What do you mean by no canonical library?
Are there already ones but just no standard one? But in this case, I
don't think adding yet another one will help :D Or isn't there a
