If avoiding success at all costs is the goal, wouldn't having a cool
logo be counter-productive?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Voting among 100+ options took a while (15-20 minutes?), but I had no
problems. The system may be suboptimal, but it works nicely. It probably
won't make people vote in wrong options (at least not too often, mistakes
always happen), so it is doing a fine job.
Thanks for organizing the voting for u
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, John Meacham wrote:
May I recommend 'approval voting' as an alternative? It doesn't require
ordering, has nice theoretial properties, and is dead simple to
implement. everyone just votes yes on the ones they approve of, you add
up the numbers and the highest one wins. Votin
Wow, I had a nice list of all the numbers of my favorites ranked
before voting began (like a week ago), and here they are all
re-numbered, rendering all that waste of time... even more of a waste
of time...
Jared.
On 3/17/09, Eelco Lempsink wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I updated a couple of logo ve
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:35 PM, John Meacham wrote:
> May I recommend 'approval voting' as an alternative? It doesn't require
> ordering, has nice theoretial properties, and is dead simple to
> implement. everyone just votes yes on the ones they approve of, you add
> up the numbers and the highe
May I recommend 'approval voting' as an alternative? It doesn't require
ordering, has nice theoretial properties, and is dead simple to
implement. everyone just votes yes on the ones they approve of, you add
up the numbers and the highest one wins. Voting yes on everything
doesn't help since then a
Sorry for newcomer silly question, but where is the voting page located?
Thanks,
Karel
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
The first glimpse of this vote scared me so much that I've closed the
page, stopped the browser and shut my computer down.
On 17 Mar 2009, at 16:06, Eelco Lempsink wrote:
Hi there!
I updated a couple of logo versions and ungrouped and regrouped the
(former) number 31. Other than that, the
On 17 mrt 2009, at 16:34, Gwern Branwen wrote:
Can we assume that the next round will be more like 10?
Depends a bit on the outcome. There will be one winner, and depending
on the winner there might be a number of variations we want to vote
about. Only if it's a really really close call m
2009/3/17 Eelco Lempsink :
> Hi there!
>
> I updated a couple of logo versions and ungrouped and regrouped the (former)
> number 31. Other than that, there was nothing standing in the way of the
> voting to begin imho, so I started up the competition.
>
> By now, I suppose everybody should have re
Hi there!
I updated a couple of logo versions and ungrouped and regrouped the
(former) number 31. Other than that, there was nothing standing in
the way of the voting to begin imho, so I started up the competition.
By now, I suppose everybody should have received their ballot. If you
th
11 matches
Mail list logo
