Thomas Schilling :
> You may concatenate the licenses of all the packages you are using. GHC
> includes the LGPL libgmp. The license file for each package is mentioned in
> the .cabal file.
>
>
If you need a version of GHC free of the LGPL, you can build GHC from source
using the package 'int
You may concatenate the licenses of all the packages you are using. GHC
includes the LGPL libgmp. The license file for each package is mentioned in
the .cabal file.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/list
it looks like ghc itself is under a BSD3 style license, if thats any help.
So per se, I think you can assume youre dealing with a BSD3 through and
through system.
see here for the ghc info
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/license
(this is something i've been sorting out for my own projects too, and to
Thanks Magnus.
I guess it means that the license of individual packages is what
that matters.
The platform on the whole does not have any single license.
In other words, I cannot just say that am using haskell platform but that I
have to say, I am using x,y and z libraries which in turn are using
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Sai Hemanth K wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am trying to use haskell for building a tool (in a commercial setting). I
> am trying to figure out what all licenses are involved here.
> Is there a single license for the entire haskell platform (and the runtime)
> or is it th
Hi,
I am trying to use haskell for building a tool (in a commercial setting).
I am trying to figure out what all licenses are involved here.
Is there a single license for the entire haskell platform (and the runtime)
or is it that I need to look at the individual licenses of all the
libraries a