Hello Tim,
Friday, August 18, 2006, 8:23:16 PM, you wrote:
I agree with that. The and = ... wasn't really an improvement over and
xs = ... xs, and if the later is easier to read that's good.
the main goal here is readability, of course
What happened to isSpace, toLower and toUpper (, from
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:46:14PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Tim,
Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:26:46 PM, you wrote:
break p = span (not . p)
it's definitely better
and = foldr () True
i think that definitions with omitted arguments can be more hrd to
understand to newbie
[...] it's just a pleasure to see all those one-line definitions
and feel how power the language should be to allow such cool things.
It is indeed. I find these explicit definitions often much more
instructive than purely implicit definitions. But, call me a nitpicker,
some of the
Oh my lord, I love how my newreader obfuscates my posts.
= span
http://undergraduate.csse.uwa.edu.au/units/230.301/lectureNotes/tourofprelude.html#span
p' xs
where
p' x = not
http://undergraduate.csse.uwa.edu.au/units/230.301/lectureNotes/tourofprelude.html#not
(p x)
= span p'
Hello Tim,
Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:26:46 PM, you wrote:
break p = span (not . p)
it's definitely better
and = foldr () True
i think that definitions with omitted arguments can be more hrd to
understand to newbie haskellers, especiallyones who not yet know the
language. as Tamas suggests,
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
i think that definitions with omitted arguments can be more hrd to
understand to newbie haskellers, especiallyones who not yet know the
language. as Tamas suggests, this page can be used to present to such
newbies taste of Haskell so listing all the parameters may allow to
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Tim Walkenhorst wrote:
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
i think that definitions with omitted arguments can be more hrd to
understand to newbie haskellers, especiallyones who not yet know the
language. as Tamas suggests, this page can be used to present to such
newbies
I feel that Haskell is missing some basic string manipuation functions, like
- replacing all occurances of one substring (or sublist) with another
string (or list).
- tokenize a string by an arbitrary delimeter
This came up not too long ago:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:55:47AM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello haskell-cafe,
The http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Special:Popularpages page lists
most popular pages on haskell wiki. I think this list is very
useful because it shows us what are the questions about Haskell
people most
Hello Tamas,
Thursday, August 17, 2006, 11:14:22 AM, you wrote:
Haskell (252,505 views)
Introduction (50,091 views)
Libraries and tools (41,864 views)
Books and tutorials (40,040 views)
Language and library specification (32,773 views)
Haskell in practice (31,698 views)
Hello Tamas,
Thursday, August 17, 2006, 2:29:26 PM, you wrote:
The link from http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Learning (to
http://www.cs.uu.nl/~afie/haskell/tourofprelude.html) is dead, so is
the one from Books_and_Tutorials.
thank you. i have fixed both. btw, you can register himself on the
Hello haskell-cafe,
The http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Special:Popularpages page lists
most popular pages on haskell wiki. I think this list is very
useful because it shows us what are the questions about Haskell
people most interested and gives us hints what should be improved in
first place.
12 matches
Mail list logo
