On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:42:39PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
I'm not sure how it was ever supposed to work, that is bootstrapping
Cabal directly using runhugs on the Setup.hs script in the Cabal dir.
Cabal has always had some cpp in it and (as far as I know) hugs does not
have a -cpp flag. I
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.ukwrote:
The way I've tested it recently is to build the Setup.hs with ghc and
use that to install Cabal for hugs. From then on one can use runhugs to
run other Setup scripts.
That's good to know, thanks.
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 20:49 +, Ross Paterson wrote:
If you can get the search path right (ie to not look in the current dir)
then I expect it would also be possible to bootstrap using a
pre-existing Cabal library for hugs.
Unfortunately that won't work: runhugs always adds the
On 29 Jan 2009, at 20:49, Ross Paterson wrote:
Hugs uses cpphs, but it has to build a dozen packages (including
Cabal)
before cpphs is available. Once it is, they're built again.
That strikes me as odd. The cpphs implementation deliberately has
minimal dependencies - Haskell'98
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:21:42PM +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
On 29 Jan 2009, at 20:49, Ross Paterson wrote:
Hugs uses cpphs, but it has to build a dozen packages (including
Cabal) before cpphs is available. Once it is, they're built again.
That strikes me as odd. The cpphs
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 21:41 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
I have tried to maintain Hugs compatibility in all my libraries, but I
must admit I am dropping it for many, due to various problems. It is
mainly that libraries I use from others haven't even been tried with
Hugs or have weird issues:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.ukwrote:
Not since then, no. However a lot of things work fine, especially if you
use a newer Cabal version.
I've been unable to figure out how to build Cabal with Hugs 2006.09.04:
$ *runhugs -98 Setup configure --hugs
Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.ukwrote:
Not since then, no. However a lot of things work fine, especially if you
use a newer Cabal version.
I've been unable to figure out how to build Cabal with Hugs 2006.09.04:
$ *runhugs
wren ng thornton wrote:
Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.ukwrote:
Not since then, no. However a lot of things work fine, especially if you
use a newer Cabal version.
I've been unable to figure out how to build Cabal with Hugs
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 12:35 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Not since then, no. However a lot of things work fine,
especially if you
use a newer Cabal version.
I've been unable to
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 16:26 -0500, wren ng thornton wrote:
wren ng thornton wrote:
Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.ukwrote:
Not since then, no. However a lot of things work fine, especially if you
use a newer Cabal
Hi,
I see Hugs last source code snapshot dates back to 2006. Was there any
updates?
Regards
--
Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto
Electronic Engineer, MSc.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:55 -0200, Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto
wrote:
Hi,
I see Hugs last source code snapshot dates back to 2006. Was there any
updates?
Not since then, no. However a lot of things work fine, especially if you
use a newer Cabal version. It's equivalent in time
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:18:55PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
I see Hugs last source code snapshot dates back to 2006. Was there any
updates?
Not since then, no. However a lot of things work fine, especially if you
use a newer Cabal version. It's equivalent in time to ghc-6.6 I think,
14 matches
Mail list logo
