Hi
Could we have a collective thought, and decide whether we wish to
either kill off all compilers that don't start with a G, or could
people at least do minimal benchmarking on Hugs? I'm not quite sure
what the solution is, but it probably needs some discussion.
I don't think doing
Hello Neil,
Wednesday, May 2, 2007, 2:48:16 PM, you wrote:
the right answer always, then I think its a much nicer choice. For
the particular case of ByteString, type ByteString=String means you
roughly import Data.List - not that much additional work or
maintenance.
then Binary library want
Hi,
I like to develop on Hugs, because its a nice platform to work with,
and provides WinHugs, auto-reloading, sub-second compilation etc.
Unfortunately some of the newer libraries (ByteString/Binary in
particular) have been optimised to within an inch of their lives on
GHC, at the cost of being
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:37 +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
I like to develop on Hugs, because its a nice platform to work with,
and provides WinHugs, auto-reloading, sub-second compilation etc.
Unfortunately some of the newer libraries (ByteString/Binary in
particular) have been optimised
