Hello Peter,
Monday, January 7, 2008, 10:59:30 PM, you wrote:
Here's a thought: I hardly know Haskell, but I can already write
some code much faster and easier than I could do in C/C++ (and I've
been programming 2 decades in that language, plus my colleagues tell
me I'm pretty productive at
Derek Elkins wrote:
Implicit parameters add an extra argument to a function conceptually.
What you need is to add an argument to SF which implicit parameters
don't know how to do since SF is just some data structure. One way to
deal with this is the way you deal with the same problem in Haskell
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:24 +0100, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Derek Elkins wrote:
Implicit parameters add an extra argument to a function conceptually.
What you need is to add an argument to SF which implicit parameters
don't know how to do since SF is just some data structure. One way to
Wow, amazing :)
How long did it take you to write this little nice example? Examples like this
are really welcome. It will take me a while to decipher, but that's the fun of
Haskell, it's an endless learning experience!
Here's a thought: I hardly know Haskell, but I can already write some
If I understand it correctly, implicit parameters in Haskell allow you to
pass values to functions with explicitly adding a parameter to each of the
functions being called (I appologize for my imperative terminology here.
How would I say this correctly? Being evaluated?)
The arrows always use
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:44 +0100, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
If I understand it correctly, implicit parameters in Haskell allow you
to pass values to functions with explicitly adding a parameter to each
of the functions being “called” (I appologize for my imperative
terminology here. How would
