[Haskell-cafe] Is there something better than tags?

2011-02-22 Thread Magnus Therning
I've been using haskellmode for vim for a while now and I'm really happy with it. It does however have some shortcomings. These are the things I find missing at times: 1. Fully functional go-to-definition. With that I mean that go-to-definition is aware of local definitions introduced in 'let'

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is there something better than tags?

2011-02-22 Thread Peter Hercek
On 02/22/2011 11:45 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: 1. Fully functional go-to-definition. With that I mean that go-to-definition is aware of local definitions introduced in 'let' and 'where' clauses and ideally also for names bound in 'do' clauses. I've found there are several ways to generate a

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is there something better than tags?

2011-02-22 Thread Marc Weber
Excerpts from Magnus Therning's message of Tue Feb 22 11:45:34 +0100 2011: generate them, and there are two tools for it, hasktags and hothasktags. haskellmode currently uses GHCi to generate tags. However, the limitation seems to be inherent in the tags format itself. AFAICS there is no way

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is there something better than tags?

2011-02-22 Thread Peter Hercek
On 02/22/2011 12:26 PM, Marc Weber wrote: learn about gd and gD those are not perfect though. Also keep in mind that # * start searches on words. They all are not language aware so they are only bad replacements for what you're looking for. When we are talking about such simple helpers then you

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is there something better than tags?

2011-02-22 Thread Marc Weber
Excerpts from Peter Hercek's message of Tue Feb 22 14:54:53 +0100 2011: Is this a correct summary? If nothing changed then yes. I didn't follow most recent development of scion. Marc Weber ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org