I'm trying to write in Haskell a function that in Java would be something
like this:
char find_match (char[] l1, char[] l2, char e){
//l1 and l2 are not empty
int i = 0;
while (l2){
char aux = l2[i];
char[n] laux = l2;
crespi.albert:
I'm trying to write in Haskell a function that in Java would be something
like this:
char find_match (char[] l1, char[] l2, char e){
//l1 and l2 are not empty
int i = 0;
while (l2){
char aux = l2[i];
char[n] laux = l2;
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:31:22AM -0700, Carajillu wrote:
I'm trying to write in Haskell a function that in Java would be something
like this:
char find_match (char[] l1, char[] l2, char e){
//l1 and l2 are not empty
int i = 0;
while (l2){
char aux =
dons:
crespi.albert:
I'm trying to write in Haskell a function that in Java would be something
like this:
char find_match (char[] l1, char[] l2, char e){
//l1 and l2 are not empty
int i = 0;
while (l2){
char aux = l2[i];
char[n] laux = l2;
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:31:22AM -0700, Carajillu wrote:
compare function just compares the two lists and return true if they are
equal, or false if they are not.
it is really a simple function, but I've been thinking about it a lot of
time and I can't get the goal.
I forgot, obviously,
wow, the simpliest ever!
Andrea Rossato wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:31:22AM -0700, Carajillu wrote:
compare function just compares the two lists and return true if they are
equal, or false if they are not.
it is really a simple function, but I've been thinking about it a lot of
mailing_list:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:31:22AM -0700, Carajillu wrote:
compare function just compares the two lists and return true if they are
equal, or false if they are not.
it is really a simple function, but I've been thinking about it a lot of
time and I can't get the goal.
I
That works good, but I have a problem with the return type, I forgot to
mention... can it be a [char]??
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
crespi.albert:
I'm trying to write in Haskell a function that in Java would be something
like this:
char find_match (char[] l1, char[] l2, char e){
Yes, they must be equal the whole way, I like this recursive solution :)
Ketil Malde-3 wrote:
Carajillu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
compare function just compares the two lists and return true if they are
equal, or false if they are not.
find_match 4*ha 4*5a 'h' returns '5' (5
Andrea Rossato [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I forgot, obviously, that lists are an instance of the Eq class...
so, this is enough:
comp l1 l2 = if l1 == l2 then True else False
Or why not:
comp l1 l2 = l1 == l2
Or simply:
comp = (==)
:-)
-k
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:20:23PM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
comp l1 l2 = if l1 == l2 then True else False
You never stop learning!
andrea
which you would just write as:
comp = (==)
and then you'd just use == anyway :)
this is why I came to love haskell: it remembers
(PDT)
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Java or C to Haskell
Yes, they must be equal the whole way, I like this recursive solution :)
Ketil Malde-3 wrote:
Carajillu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
compare function just compares the two lists and return true if they are
equal, or false
:29 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Java or C to Haskell
Yes, they must be equal the whole way, I like this recursive solution :)
Ketil Malde-3 wrote:
Carajillu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
compare function just compares the two lists and return true if they are
equal, or false
13 matches
Mail list logo
