Hi all,
I'm trying to catch up with all the wonderful Haskell Types, classes,
Abstract Data Types, Algebraic Data Types, Types that give peoples
headaches and all the other, deeper stuff I have been happily putting off.
Now to look smart I have a bookshelf full of books for smart people and
TaPL, iirc, is more about compilers and typesystems, and not
specifically about haskell. RWH will give you a cover of the basic stuff
and common data types. The Typeclassopedia will cover all the major
typeclasses (google search ought to reveal it's super-secret location).
Otherwise, the
Hah!
I always knew it!
I'm not the only getting a headache from this.
Thanks Joseph
Joseph Fredette schrieb:
TaPL, iirc, is more about compilers and typesystems, and not
specifically about haskell. RWH will give you a cover of the basic
stuff and common data types. The Typeclassopedia will
I'm trying to catch up with all the wonderful Haskell Types, classes,
Abstract Data Types, Algebraic Data Types, Types that give peoples
headaches and all the other, deeper stuff I have been happily putting off.
Hmm, do we need more pragmas?-)
{-# LANGUAGE TypesThatGivePeopleHeadaches #-}
{-#
claus.reinke:
I'm trying to catch up with all the wonderful Haskell Types, classes,
Abstract Data Types, Algebraic Data Types, Types that give peoples
headaches and all the other, deeper stuff I have been happily putting
off.
Hmm, do we need more pragmas?-)
{-# LANGUAGE
