Hello,
Several days ago I posted a question about retargeting GHC to generate
CIL so that Haskell could be a .NET language. One objection was Haskell
"lazy" nature didn't fit well with .NET's CLR. I found a couple publications
....
http://www.ddj.com/windows/184404967;jsessionid=0AVCEATVAEGKMQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN2JVN?_requestid=33708
... more popular presentation
http://docs.msdnaa.net/ark_new/Webfiles/WhitePapers/ECOOP.pdf ... this
paper seems to be saying that Mondrian's "lazy" nature fits in quite well
Any opinions from Mondrian people "listening" in? What lessons were learned
from the Mondrian experience that could speak to Haskell in particular GHC?
Regards, Vasili
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
