Hello Joel,
Tuesday, December 06, 2005, 6:42:32 PM, you wrote:
JR> On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:47 PM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
>> either
>> 1) use MVars/TMVars instead of Channels. in any case your logging
>> thread must consume data not slower than other channels produce then.
>> in fact, using Chan have
On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:47 PM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
either
1) use MVars/TMVars instead of Channels. in any case your logging
thread must consume data not slower than other channels produce then.
in fact, using Chan have meaning only to smooth temporary speed
differences between different threads.
I must eat crow :-(. Moving the thread and logger mailboxes from
TChan to TMVar reduced memory consumption by an order of magnitude. I
found my space leak. Moving serialization from [Word8] to unboxed
arrays did not hurt either.
On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:47 PM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
either
1)
Hello Joel,
Tuesday, December 06, 2005, 12:54:57 PM, you wrote:
JR> Is there a way to check the number of outstanding messages in a Chan
JR> or TChan?
either
1) use MVars/TMVars instead of Channels. in any case your logging
thread must consume data not slower than other channels produce then.
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:54:57AM +, Joel Reymont wrote:
> Is there a way to check the number of outstanding messages in a Chan
> or TChan?
>
> I suspect my problem is related to not reading messages fast enough
> and I'd like to troubleshoot this by scanning my channels once every
> fe
Is there a way to check the number of outstanding messages in a Chan
or TChan?
I suspect my problem is related to not reading messages fast enough
and I'd like to troubleshoot this by scanning my channels once every
few seconds and dumping statistics.
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wager
