Christopher Lane Hinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having a debianized cabal-install would be the biggest win in my book. If
there were an unofficial debianized mirror of hackage, I probably wouldn't
use it anyway.
I might. I generally want to use newer versions of development stuff
(i.e.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
be a bit of a no-no. Debian packages are expected to have active
magnus:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
be a bit of a no-no. Debian packages are expected to have
Ketil Malde wrote:
Christopher Lane Hinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having a debianized cabal-install would be the biggest win in my book. If
there were an unofficial debianized mirror of hackage, I probably wouldn't
use it anyway.
I might.
I would. (I run Ubuntu at home, Debian on my
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 22.08.2008, 10:13 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
nomeata:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 22.08.2008, 10:13 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
- the cdbs extension for supporting haskell (the one posted on
debian-haskell mailing list a while ago)
I keep the newest version of that at
http://people.debian.org/~kaol/repos/hlibrary/
One thing that it doesn't do yet is to
kaol:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
- the cdbs extension for supporting haskell (the one posted on
debian-haskell mailing list a while ago)
I keep the newest version of that at
http://people.debian.org/~kaol/repos/hlibrary/
One thing that it doesn't
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:10:08 +0300,
Kari Pahula wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
- the cdbs extension for supporting haskell (the one posted on
debian-haskell mailing list a while ago)
I keep the newest version of that at
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Can the Debian/Haskell interest parties say something about
who's doing what in this area? Is there hope for a concrete
effort to import large numbers of hackage apps and tools into Debian?
I made a stab at it, but ran
Can the Debian/Haskell interest parties say something about
who's doing what in this area? Is there hope for a concrete
effort to import large numbers of hackage apps and tools into Debian?
-- Don
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
be a bit of a no-no.
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
be a bit of a no-no. Debian packages are expected to have active
maintainers both upstream and on the debian side, and to build without a
hitch
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
be a bit of a no-no. Debian packages are expected to have active
maintainers both upstream and on the debian side, and to build without a
hitch
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
be a bit of a no-no. Debian packages are expected to have active
maintainers both upstream and on the debian side, and to build without a
hitch
At Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:06:23 +0100,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
Any reason the manual steps here aren't automated?
There's not much benefit from automating them (although if someone did
so, with a nice way to edit the description etc, then it would be
handy). The vast majority of the time in
15 matches
Mail list logo
