On 11-05-25 08:52 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
With my wl-pprint-text package, Jason Dagit suggested to me on
#haskell that it would make sense to make such a pretty-printer be
class-based so that the same API
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 May 2011 08:49, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
On 5/25/11 1:03 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
Well,
With my wl-pprint-text package, Jason Dagit suggested to me on
#haskell that it would make sense to make such a pretty-printer be
class-based so that the same API could be used for String, ByteString,
Text, etc.
I was thinking of doing so, and in such a case it would probably make
the most amount
Hi Ivan
Forks are good, no?
The Parsec experience has suggested to me at least, that new author's
capping another author's work by bumping up to a major version,
causes a significant difficulties even when the original author has
gone.
As for wl-pprint, it was a very tidy library in its
On 25 May 2011 22:17, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ivan
Forks are good, no?
The Parsec experience has suggested to me at least, that new author's
capping another author's work by bumping up to a major version,
causes a significant difficulties even when the original
2011/5/25 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
On 25 May 2011 22:17, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ivan
Forks are good, no?
The Parsec experience has suggested to me at least, that new author's
capping another author's work by bumping up to a major version,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
With my wl-pprint-text package, Jason Dagit suggested to me on
#haskell that it would make sense to make such a pretty-printer be
class-based so that the same API could be used for String, ByteString,
Text,
On 25 May 2011 22:52, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
With my wl-pprint-text package, Jason Dagit suggested to me on
#haskell that it would make sense to make such a pretty-printer be
On 25 May 2011 23:23, Otakar Smrz otakar.s...@cmu.edu wrote:
I took over the maintenance of wl-pprint since Stefan suggested it
himself. I needed to include OverlappingInstances, because that was
required to make better use of the library (there is a difference having
this flag there, which
On Wed, 25 May 2011 05:17:46 -0700, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ivan
Forks are good, no?
The Parsec experience has suggested to me at least, that new author's
capping another author's work by bumping up to a major version,
causes a significant difficulties even when the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
With my wl-pprint-text package, Jason Dagit suggested to me on
#haskell that it would make sense to make such a pretty-printer be
class-based so that the same API could be used for String, ByteString,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, using the Char8 version.
Just because you *could* do that, it doesn't mean that you *should*. It's a
bad idea to use bytestrings for manipulating text, yet the only plausible
reason to have wl-pprint
On May 25, 2011 11:08 AM, KQ qu...@sparq.org wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 05:17:46 -0700, Stephen Tetley
stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ivan
Forks are good, no?
The Parsec experience has suggested to me at least, that new author's
capping another author's work by bumping up to a major
Quoting Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com:
On May 25, 2011 11:08 AM, KQ qu...@sparq.org wrote:
The HackageDB could the provide this information in the description page
of a package, and it could even automatically cross-reference and supplement
the referred package descriptions, so that if
I wanted the second set because I may want to establish the link even if I'm
not the maintainer of the second package.
I would imagine that the second set of actions would be otherwise identical,
and the link would show up on either package regardless of which set of
verbs was used.
Antoine
On
On 5/25/11 1:56 PM, Antoine Latter wrote:
On May 25, 2011 12:50 PM,qu...@sparq.org wrote:
Quoting Antoine Latteraslat...@gmail.com:
The only thing I'd add would be the additional actions ReplacedBy,
ExtendedBy and RedesignedBy.
I was actually thinking that this was the part that HackageDB
On 5/25/11 1:03 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, using the Char8 version.
Just because you *could* do that, it doesn't mean that you *should*. It's a
bad idea to use bytestrings for manipulating text,
On 26 May 2011 08:49, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
On 5/25/11 1:03 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, using the Char8 version.
Just because you *could* do that, it doesn't mean that you
18 matches
Mail list logo
