On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:16:17PM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And as far as bundled versions, it's the desire to *remove* a bundled
version that's apparently at issue. I'm not sure why this is
considered desirable, but apparently some folks feel
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 12:16 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And as far as bundled versions, it's the desire to *remove* a bundled
version that's apparently at issue. I'm not sure why this is
considered desirable, but apparently some folks feel strongly
Duncan,
I believe the major darcs issue is the changed GADT implementation
between 6.6, so that neither 6.6 or 6.8 is a superset/subset of the
other - leading to a situation where they have to use a common subset of
both.
Thanks
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 19:24 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
Hello,
I would like to find out if any darcs users who build from the source
are still using ghc 6.6?
I'd just like to point out (again ;-) ) than it's not that hard to
support older platforms. The only constraint is that people not
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Mitchell, Neil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan,
I believe the major darcs issue is the changed GADT implementation
between 6.6, so that neither 6.6 or 6.8 is a superset/subset of the
other - leading to a situation where they have to use a common subset of
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:17:35AM -, Mitchell, Neil wrote:
Duncan,
I believe the major darcs issue is the changed GADT implementation
between 6.6, so that neither 6.6 or 6.8 is a superset/subset of the
other - leading to a situation where they have to use a common subset of
both.
No,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:01 AM, David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:17:35AM -, Mitchell, Neil wrote:
Duncan,
I believe the major darcs issue is the changed GADT implementation
between 6.6, so that neither 6.6 or 6.8 is a superset/subset of the
other -
David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And as far as bundled versions, it's the desire to *remove* a bundled
version that's apparently at issue. I'm not sure why this is
considered desirable, but apparently some folks feel strongly about
this.
Could someone please summarize what code is
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Trent W. Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And as far as bundled versions, it's the desire to *remove* a bundled
version that's apparently at issue. I'm not sure why this is
considered desirable, but apparently some folks
Hello,
I would like to find out if any darcs users who build from the source
are still using ghc 6.6?
If you are such a user, please let me know.
Thanks,
Jason
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
10 matches
Mail list logo
