ghc-pkg check doesn't list any broken dependencies.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 August 2010 03:18, Lyndon Maydwell maydw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
This makes perfect sense, but as I just discovered using ghci -v there
is an
On 31 August 2010 20:38, Lyndon Maydwell maydw...@gmail.com wrote:
ghc-pkg check doesn't list any broken dependencies.
You sure this is with the same user? ghci is unlikely to complain
about broken libraries if ghc-pkg check doesn't...
--
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
Yep. Definitely the same user.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 August 2010 20:38, Lyndon Maydwell maydw...@gmail.com wrote:
ghc-pkg check doesn't list any broken dependencies.
You sure this is with the same user? ghci is unlikely
Do you have ~/.cabal/bin/ in your PATH?
- Sebastian
Am 31.08.2010 um 15:57 schrieb Lyndon Maydwell:
Yep. Definitely the same user.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 August 2010 20:38, Lyndon Maydwell maydw...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep :)
Is there a batch of information that might be useful? I can send any
relevant files, aliases, versions, etc at once to help if you like.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Sebastian Höhn
sebastian.ho...@iig.uni-freiburg.de wrote:
Do you have ~/.cabal/bin/ in your PATH?
- Sebastian
Am
Do you have ~/.cabal/bin or $HOME/.cabal/bin ? The latter is
preferable as some issues arise with the former...
On 1 September 2010 03:29, Lyndon Maydwell maydw...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep :)
Is there a batch of information that might be useful? I can send any
relevant files, aliases, versions,
$HOME/.cabal/bin
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have ~/.cabal/bin or $HOME/.cabal/bin ? The latter is
preferable as some issues arise with the former...
On 1 September 2010 03:29, Lyndon Maydwell maydw...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep
Hello,
perhaps I am just blind or is it a difficult issue: I would like to
generate Char values in a given Range for QuickCheck2. There is this
simple example from the haskell book:
instance Arbitrary Char where
arbitrary = elements (['A'..'Z'] ++ ['a' .. 'z'] ++ ~...@#$%^*())
This does not
You can create a wrapper with a newtype and then define an instance for that.
newtype Char2 = Char2 Char
instance Arbitrary Char2 where
arbitrary = ...
You'll have to do some wrapping and unwrapping when calling your
properties to get/set the underlying Char, but this is probably the
easiest
Define a custom element generator, which has characters with your
desired values:
myRange :: Gen Char
myRange = elements (['A'..'Z'] ++ ['a' .. 'z'] ++ ~...@#$%^*())
You can use forAll to run tests with a specific generator:
forAll myRange $ \c - chr (ord c) == c
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at
I'm just trying these examples, and I can't figure out how to import
quickcheck2 rather than quickcheck1. I've looked around but I can't
seem to find any information on this. How do I do it?
Thanks!
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:56 PM, John Millikin jmilli...@gmail.com wrote:
Define a custom
Update your cabal package list, and then install QuickCheck.
Optionally, you can use a version specifier:
cabal update
cabal install 'QuickCheck = 2'
This should make QuickCheck 2 the default in GHCI. If it doesn't, you
may need to specify the version:
ghci -package QuickCheck-2.2
Thanks!
This makes perfect sense, but as I just discovered using ghci -v there
is an even stranger problem. I'm side-tracking slightly from the
original question here, but nevertheless...
GHC gives the following output:
---
GHCi, version 6.12.3: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
command
On 31 August 2010 03:18, Lyndon Maydwell maydw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
This makes perfect sense, but as I just discovered using ghci -v there
is an even stranger problem. I'm side-tracking slightly from the
original question here, but nevertheless...
GHC gives the following output:
14 matches
Mail list logo
