2010/9/6 Manuel M T Chakravarty c...@cse.unsw.edu.au:
Ian Lynagh:
To fix this problem, we propose that we create a haskell.org
committee, which is responsible for answering these sorts of questions,
although for some questions they may choose to poll the community at
large if they think
Ian et al
| To fix this problem, we propose that we create a haskell.org
| committee, which is responsible for answering these sorts of questions,
| although for some questions they may choose to poll the community at
| large if they think appropriate.
I think that's an excellent idea. I think
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| As membership of the Haskell community is not well-defined, and voting
| would potentially be open to abuse if anyone were able to vote, we
| propose that the committee should choose their replacements from open
| nominations.
I agree with the problem, and I think
Ian Lynagh:
To fix this problem, we propose that we create a haskell.org
committee, which is responsible for answering these sorts of questions,
although for some questions they may choose to poll the community at
large if they think appropriate.
[..]
Unfortunately, this gives us a
