[Haskell-cafe] RE: Haskell vs. Clean

2006-01-05 Thread Scherrer, Chad
Daniel, My knowledge of Clean is fairly limited (even more so than my knowledge of Haskell), but no one seems to be responding to this, so I'll take a crack at it. Here is why I've stuck with Haskell instead of Clean: 1. It runs well on Linux 2. The license is more open 3. There is a

Re: [Haskell-cafe] RE: Haskell vs. Clean

2006-01-05 Thread Neil Mitchell
Hi My knowledge of Clean is fairly limited Mine too, but one of the biggest differences is that Clean has uniqueness types instead of Monads. They are in fact so similar that you can convert between them, using Hacle: http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~mfn/hacle/ I believe also that Clean has a

RE: [Haskell-cafe] RE: Haskell vs. Clean

2006-01-05 Thread Scherrer, Chad
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 1:58 PM To: Scherrer, Chad Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; haskell-cafe@haskell.org Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] RE: Haskell vs. Clean Hi My knowledge of Clean is fairly limited Mine too, but one of the biggest differences is that Clean has uniqueness types

Re: [Haskell-cafe] RE: Haskell vs. Clean

2006-01-05 Thread Neil Mitchell
On 1/5/06, Scherrer, Chad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting. Have there been any performance comparisons vs GHC et al? Yes: http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~mfn/hacle/index.html#fin http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~mfn/hacle/eval.html ___