On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 07:55:50AM -0800, Scherrer, Chad wrote:
From: S Koray Can [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why not do this: name none of those modules Main.hs, and have an empty
module Main.hs with only import MainDeJour and main =
MainDeJour.main so you can just edit just that file.
Yes, good point. I suppose there's really no need to re-declare main once it's
been imported. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Remi Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 12/29/2005 4:34 PM
To: Scherrer, Chad
Cc: S Koray Can; haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] RE
Scherrer, Chad wrote:
module Main where
import A
import B
main = A.f B.f
module A where
f = ...
module B where
f = ...
in a single file. This example is straight from chapter 5 of the Report,
and no mention is made (that I could find) about modules needing to be
in
Hello S,
Friday, December 16, 2005, 6:32:47 AM, you wrote:
SKC Why not do this: name none of those modules Main.hs, and have an empty
SKC module Main.hs with only import MainDeJour and main =
SKC MainDeJour.main so you can just edit just that file.
ghc has option -main-is which is just what
Scherrer, Chad writes:
When I'm using ghci, I have lots of modules that I
sometimes want to load as Main, and sometimes I only
want them loaded as a dependency from another module.
Currently, I have to go into each file to change the
module Foo where line to do this.
Maybe the -main-is
-Original Message-
From: S Koray Can [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why not do this: name none of those modules Main.hs, and have an empty
module Main.hs with only import MainDeJour and main =
MainDeJour.main so you can just edit just that file.
Cheers,
Koray
