[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 2.4.0

2008-11-20 Thread Simon Marlow
David Waern wrote: 2008/11/6 Wolfgang Jeltsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Donnerstag, 6. November 2008 00:21 schrieb David Waern: * Add framed view of the HTML documentation After many years with many people telling us that frames are bad, you add frame support to Haddock? Hmm. You should

[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 2.4.0

2008-11-06 Thread David Waern
2008/11/6 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Will .haddock files generated by haddock-2.3.0 work with haddock-2.4? If not it would be preferable to have a 2.3.1 release or something for distributions that want to package haddock separately from ghc (eg gentoo). Otherwise we somehow have to hack

[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 2.4.0

2008-11-06 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 00:21 +0100, David Waern wrote: -- Haddock 2.4.0 A new version of Haddock, the Haskell documentation tool, is out. This is a later version than the one shipped with GHC 6.10.1,

[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 2.4.0

2008-11-06 Thread Thomas Schilling
[Redirecting to cafe@ since haskell@ is not meant for discussions] Sure, they are bad for one reason: you cannot link to a frame configuration directly. However, for this particular use case they are quite handy. There are some features missing (like hoogle integration) and some annoyances (if