Hallo,
On 24/11/06, Benjamin Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, you could simply return the console output as (part of) the result
> of the atomic action. Wrap it in a WriterT monad transformer, even.
But this would break atomicity, wouldn't it?
In the sense as you just described, yes.
Hi Liyang HU
you wrote:
> On 23/11/06, Benjamin Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One answer is in fact "to make it so that Console.Write can be rolled
>> back too". To achieve this one can factor the actual output to another
>> task and inside the transaction merely send the message to a
>>
