Patai Gergely patai_gerg...@fastmail.fm wrote:
...
I don't think using dirty tricks to implement FRP deserves flak, at
all, from my POV, it sounds like complaining that the IO monad is
implemented using C... meaning that if you're that close to bare
thunks, you have every right to use any means
Patai Gergely patai_gerg...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Am I right thinking that the
NOINLINE pragma on unsafeDupablePerformIO prevents the problem of
multiple evaluation discussed yesterday?
From what I know and experienced, yes. Each individual unsafePerformIO
only ever evaluates its action once,
Am Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 09:03 schrieb Achim Schneider:
I don't think using dirty tricks to implement FRP deserves flak, at
all, from my POV, it sounds like complaining that the IO monad is
implemented using C... meaning that if you're that close to bare
thunks, you have every right to use
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason why I'm talking about examples and not semantics is
because the latter seems to be pretty hard to get right for FRP?
There's a difference between those two? I've heard much, but never
anyone complaining about specifications overlapping in a
