Hi Nikolas,
I supppose you're talking about HaRe, that Thomas Schilling linked to.
I have no idea how that system is built so I can't answer your
question. But in principle I don't see why not. :-)
In principle it would actually be quite difficult. HaRe is Haskell 98,
built upon the
Do you have any program transformation DSL to make things easier? Or
quickcheck tests or anything to make things easier?
On 18 mar 2008, at 11.28, C.M.Brown wrote:
Hi Nikolas,
I supppose you're talking about HaRe, that Thomas Schilling linked
to.
I have no idea how that system is built
I believe that the limitation is that they use Programatica's parser
to get an AST to run their refactorings on. I think they've looked
several times at using ghc's apis to do this, but hit various
problems. I think that the main problem is that no other parser
preserves things like code
I'm pleased to announce a new release for the haskell-src-exts package.
Twice in two days even. :-)
haskell-src-exts 0.3.3 - now with support for type equality constraints.
cabal sdist:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/haskell-src-exts-0.3.3
darcs repo:
Could this be used to add support for refactoring of source files
containing language extensions?
Because if I'm correct, the current most popular refactoring solution (I
forgot the name) for Haskell does not support extensions.
It would also be nice to add support for the arrows syntax :-)
On 17 mar 2008, at 23.53, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Could this be used to add support for refactoring of source files
containing language extensions?
Because if I'm correct, the current most popular refactoring
solution (I forgot the name) for Haskell does not support extensions.
HaRe -
Could this be used to add support for refactoring of source files
containing language extensions?
Because if I'm correct, the current most popular refactoring solution (I
forgot the name) for Haskell does not support extensions.
I supppose you're talking about HaRe, that Thomas Schilling
On 17 Mar 2008, at 23:41, Niklas Broberg wrote:
Could this be used to add support for refactoring of source files
containing language extensions?
Because if I'm correct, the current most popular refactoring
solution (I
forgot the name) for Haskell does not support extensions.
I supppose
